Leonardo Da Vinci's "Irrelevant" Scribbles Are The First Recorded Laws Of Friction

By - 436 words

Language

Reading Level

Listen to Article

The Last Supper (Leonardo da Vinci Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)

Legendary artist and scientist Leonardo da Vinci, who conducted the first systematic study of friction, has always been credited as the pioneer in Tribology. But while his famous machinery design sketches reflected the inventor’s knowledge of the benefits and drawbacks of friction, precisely when and how Leonardo developed these ideas, has remained a mystery.

Now, a detailed study conducted by University of Cambridge Professor Ian Hutchings, has revealed that Leonardo had acquired a sophisticated understanding of the laws of friction in 1493 — almost 200 years before they were formalized! What’s stunning is that the evidence, contained in a tiny 92 mm x 63 mm (3.6 x 2.5 in) notebook, was overlooked, despite being on public display at London’s Victoria and Albert Museum for over a century.

The first recorded laws of friction ( Photo Credit: V&A Museum, London)

That’s because the artist had outlined his groundbreaking research on the same page as a sketch of a woman thought to be an older version of Helen of Troy. Hence, while experts spent years debating the significance of the image and its accompanying phrase, “Cosa Bella mortal passa e non dura,” (“mortal beauty passes and does not last”), they paid little attention to the scribbles below. In the 1920’s, the museum director even went as far as labeling the information as "irrelevant notes and diagrams in red chalk."

It was not until Hutchings decided to create a detailed chronology of the brilliant scientist’s studies of friction that he realized the “irrelevant” scribbles were a critical component of Leonardo’s ideas and perhaps even the “aha!” moment of his work with friction. The red chalk writing and images, sketched in Leonardo’s characteristic “mirror writing” from right to left, depict rows of blocks being pulled by a weight hanging over a pulley. If that sounds familiar, it is because it is similar to the experiment conducted in classrooms today to demonstrate the laws of friction.

Sketches dating from 1506-8 showing attempts to analyze the friction on a cylinder supported in a half-bearing. Credit: from the Codex Atlanticus folio 261r, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, Milan

Hutchings, who published his findings in the scientific journal Wear, in July, says, “The sketches and text show Leonardo understood the fundamentals of friction in 1493. He knew that the force of friction acting between two sliding surfaces is proportional to the load pressing the surfaces together and that friction is independent of the apparent area of contact between the two surfaces.”

Before this, the discovery of the rules of friction was credited to 18th century French scientist, Guillaume Amontons. Researchers say Hutchings’ findings do not mean Guillaume stole Leonardo’s ideas or that he was even was aware of them. It just confirms that Leonardo had figured out the fundamentals of Tribology almost 200 years before the rest of us, making him the true pioneer in the subject.

Resources: newatlas.com, phys.org,collective-evolution.com

Cite Article
Learn Keywords in this Article
137 Comments
  • Dijaalmost 8 years
    That's cool
    • sharlett
      sharlettalmost 8 years
      ASOWOME
      • iDubbbzalmost 8 years
        Hey, that's pretty good
        • ep.awesomedancealmost 8 years
          always find awesome articles on this site especially this one because I luv Leonardo's artwork! God blessed this world with amazing creations!
          • dulajperera
            dulajpereraalmost 8 years
            Indeed, the title of the person who first discovered the ideas of friction goes to Leonardo Da Vinci. What makes him an intellect is his professionalism in arts and science. After all, science does have its similarities with religion, but I am talking about buddhism. All the scientific discoveries clearly match with buddhism. That is why it is said that Buddhism is a science. It could be categorized as ''religious science''. I wonder if scientists like Da Vinci ever knew about the similarities between religion and science. I believe that all science facts considered there is no supreme god. The whole plane of existence is something that keeps destroying itself and then being reborn.
            • have a nice dayalmost 8 years
              who ever reads this comment have a nice day
            • pastorking08
              pastorking08almost 8 years
              god is amazing
              • Madonnaalmost 8 years
                I like to eat
                • iDubbbzalmost 8 years
                  Hey, that's pretty good.
                  • kazuto_kirigaya
                    kazuto_kirigayaalmost 8 years
                    BTW who likes sao (sword art online)